LOSTblog | Blog | Categories | Analysis

Click below for great LOST gear!

ABC's Lost Store - Click here to shop!
This entry is part 1 of 2 in the series VALIS

Phillip K. Dick“I want to write about people I love, and put them into a fictional world spun out of my own mind, not the world we actually have, because the world we actually have does not meet my standards. Okay, so I should revise my standards; I’m out of step. I should yield to reality. I have never yielded to reality. That’s what SF is all about. If you wish to yield to reality, go read Philip Roth; read the New York literary establishment mainstream bestselling writers….This is why I love SF. I love to read it; I love to write it. The SF writer sees not just possibilities but wild possibilities. It’s not just ‘What if’ – it’s ‘My God; what if’ – in frenzy and hysteria. The Martians are always coming.” — Phillip K. Dick, writer, philosopher and science fiction god.

As I’m sure you already know, Blade Runner (1982) is one of my very favorite films of all time, so I was totally jazzed to write up this month’s bookclub selection, VALIS (1981), and its author, Phillip K. Dick [1928 - 1982]. Blade Runner, of course, was based on PKD’s novel, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (1968), and although the film altered the book quite a bit, PKD wholeheartedly supported both the changes and the film itself.

But don’t take my word for it. PKD himself wrote a letter to that effect dated October 11, 1981 to one Mr. Jeff Walker, executive producer and film marketing guru [Remember when Tim Burton cast Michael Keaton as the lead in Batman (1989) and everyone freaked out? Jeff Walker is the reason that film made a bazillion dollars at the box office].

And I quote:

What I am saying is that all of you collectively may have created a unique new form of graphic, artistic expression, never before seen. And, I think, BLADE RUNNER is going to revolutionize our conceptions (sic) of what science fiction is and, more, can be.

As for my own role in the BLADE RUNNER project, I can only say that I did not know that a work of mine or a set of ideas of mine could be escalated into such stunning dimensions.  My life and my creative work are justified and completed by BLADE RUNNER. — Phillip Dick, The Official Site

High praise indeed.

[And he didn't even see the "good" version! Pardon my French, but HOLY SH*T! This would be like Darlton writing ME a letter and saying something I wrote blew their minds. I bet Walker has this letter framed on his desk! Hm. Now I'm wondering what Mr. Dick would have thought of LOST?]

Despite his early death (he was only 53, and yes, 53 is YOUNG), PKD’s works remain interesting to Hollywood to this day. Genre-ly speaking, [HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!] only Stephen King has more books adapted to film. Unfortunately, like Stephen King’s, most PKD film adaptations are no great shakes. Luckily, NOBODY (so far that I can tell) has been dumb enough to greenlight an adaptation of VALIS.

[Although, I DARE you to read the novel and try to argue how much of LOST's a-doings are NOT derived from this novel. Good luck with that, btw.]

FUN PKD FACTS:

  • He had a twin sister, Jane. She died at six weeks old. Losing his twin sister had a profound effect on PKD throughout his life. And for some weird reason, according to my resource, he blamed his mother for Jane’s death. ["Phil's traumatic sense of separation from her, an experience common to many twins. . .contributed to the dualist (twin-poled) dilemmas that dominated his creative work - science fiction (SF)/mainstream, real/fake, human/android. It was out of these pressing dualities that the two vast questions emerged which Dick often cited as encompassing his writing: What is Real? and What is Human?" -- PKD Official Site].
  • From seventh grade on, he suffered from bouts of vertigo [extreme and sudden dizziness. My college roommate had this. It really sucks].
  • He was randomly diagnosed as schizophrenic. That is, throughout his life, some doctors diagnosed him as having the mood disorder and some said he was “perfectly sane.” [When you're a writer, this happens more often than not.]
  • Reading The Wizard of Oz as a kid was a seminal moment for his development as a storyteller.
  • He was married five times [ouch!] and had three children.

[Twin poled, people!! TWIN POLED!!]

2 – 3 – 74

This next bit is so bizarre, I’ll have to directly quote it.

In February and March 1974, Dick experienced a series of visions and auditions [I think he means auditory hallucinations -- like hearing voices] including an information-rich “pink light” beam that transmitted directly into his consciousness. A year after the events, in March 1975, Dick summarized the 2-3-74 experiences that would pervade his writing for the final eight years of his life:

“I speak of The Restorer of What Was Lost The Mender of What Was Broken.”

“March 16, 1974: It appeared – in vivid fire, with shining colors and balanced patterns – and released me from every thrall, inner and outer.

“March 18, 1974: It, from inside me, looked out and saw the world did not compute, that I – and it – had been lied to. It denied the reality, and power, and authenticity of the world, saying, ‘This cannot exist; it cannot exist.’

“March 20, 1974: It seized me entirely, lifting me from the limitations of the space-time matrix; it mastered me as, at the same time, I knew that the world around me was cardboard, a fake. Through its power of perception I saw what really existed, and through its power of no-thought decision, I acted to free myself. It took on in battle, as a champion of all human spirits in thrall, every evil, every Iron Imprisoning thing.”

[Whoa. Sounds like Mr. Dick had a party in Room 23, don't it?]

Naturally, critics and academics alike missed the entire freakin’ point and argued over whether PKD’s visions were “real” or not. [Duh.] The truly interesting thing, however, is how these visions galvanized PKD’s writing the last 8 years of his life. VALIS, published only a year before his death in 1982, was written during this period. Keep an eye out for the “pink light” as you read along this month.

VALIS is a flipping complicated book to summarize [aren't they all?], and I don’t want to spoil too much of the plot for you. Luckily, I found a simple review on Amazon.com that fits the bill.

VALIS is “the first of Dick’s three final novels (the others are Divine Invasion and The Transmigration of Timothy Archer). Known as science fiction only for lack of a better category, “Valis” takes place in our world and may even be semi-autobiographical. It is a fool’s search for God, who turns out to be a virus, a joke, and a mental hologram transmitted from an orbiting satellite.

The proponent of the novel, Horselover Fat, is thrust into a theological quest when he receives communion in a burst of pink laser light. From the cancer ward of a bay area hospital to the ranch of a fraudulent charismatic religious figure who turns out to have a direct com link with God, Dick leads us down the twisted paths of Gnostic belief, mixed with his own bizarre and compelling philosophy. Truly an eye opening look at the nature of consciousness and divinity.”

Good term to know while reading VALIS: GNOSTICISM

“Gnosticism expresses a specific religious experience, an experience that does not lend itself to the language of theology or philosophy, but which is instead closely affinitized to, and expresses itself through, the medium of myth. Indeed, one finds that most Gnostic scriptures take the forms of myths. The term “myth” should not here be taken to mean “stories that are not true”, but rather, that the truths embodied in these myths are of a different order from the dogmas of theology or the statements of philosophy.” — The Gnosis Archive

It’s easy to get brain freeze from considering the nature of “reality.” Take careful note: Don’t let the philosophy get you down! Take a page from  PKD fan and flickr pro Torley:

All I really need to know I learned from Philip K. Dick:

* It never happened. Or did it?
* Androids used for slave labor have issues.
* Real animals make us feel better about ourselves.
* It’s easier to believe a lie than dismiss the truth.
* When in Rome… well, we’re all living in Rome.
* You, too, can change your personality like clothing.
* Horselover Fat is not a porn star’s name.
* Superior mutants are sexy.
* Nazis are always evil, no matter what universe you’re in.
* Telepaths are a complicated lot.
* Paranoia is ideal for the adventurous.
* Sometimes, it’s OK to go insane.
* Some memories are best left repressed.
* Words control people.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

We hope you enjoy this month’s Bookclub selection and urge you to keep an eye out for the WTAL BOOKCLUB PODCAST on VALIS in early February.

Happy reading!

This entry is part 5 of 5 in the series Alice In Wonderland

I talk with @lostiegirl78 about Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll. And you’ll want to listen just to hear which one of our island dwellers is named Queen of Hearts. PODCAST GOLD, I TELL YOU.

Take a listen below or head here to download.

Picture 9
This entry is part 3 of 5 in the series Alice In Wonderland

This month WRLB/Bookclub’s selection is Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll.  This book, I’m sure you’ll remember, pops up on LOST quite a bit.  However, a specific EDITION of this book is associated with Jack/Christian/David [in "Something Nice Back Home" and "Lighthouse"].

The Annotated Alice: The Definitive Edition Lewis Carroll, Introduction and Notes by Martin Gardner.

It’s that “NOTES by Martin Gardner” part that sent your old pal Amy to the bookstore. The NOTES are the most valuable clue here.

Try THIS on for size:

From “Chapter VI: Pig and Pepper” [Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, pp. 65-66]

Alice, having released a baby-turned-into-a-pig into the forest, comes upon “the Cheshire-Cat sitting on a bough of a tree a few yards off.”

The Cat only grinned when it saw Alice. It looked good-natured she thought: still it had very long claws and a great many teeth, so she felt that it ought to be treated with respect.

“Cheshire-Puss,” she began, rather timidly, as she did not at all know whether it would like the name: however, it only grinned a little wider. “Come, it’s pleased so far,” thought Alice, and she went on. “Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?”
“That depends a good deal on where you want to get to, said the Cat.
“I don’t much care where — ” said Alice.
“Then it doesn’t matter which way you go,” said the Cat.
“—so long as I get somewhere,” Alice added as an explanation.
“Oh, you’re sure to do that,” said the Cat, “if you only walk long enough.”
Alice felt that this could not be denied, so she tried another question. “What sort of people live here?”
“In that direction,” the Cat said, waiving its right paw round, “lives  a Hatter: and in that direction,” waving the other paw, “lives a March Hare. Visit either you like: they’re both mad.”

[Notice that the Hatter and the Hare "live" in opposite directions -- they are POLARIZED. Get it? We learn in the next chapter that they actually ARE together. They are stuck at the tea table (with a sleepy dormouse) because Time is angry with the Hatter. Um, I guess the Hatter ticked him off. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!]. Continue reading »

This entry is part 2 of 5 in the series The Third Policeman

Original Book Cover

Amy has a new favorite literature website: Bookslut (www.bookslut.com)

[Isn't that a great name?]

Bookslut is a monthly web magazine and daily blog dedicated to those who love to read. We provide a constant supply of news, reviews, commentary, insight, and more than occasional opinions.

I highly recommend it. Also, check out Bookslut’s ComicbookSlut Column!

After poking all over the web, it was Bookslut that finally shed some light on this month’s WRLB/Bookclub selection: The Third Policeman (1967) by Flann O’Brien. Well, kinda.

O’Brien, an Irish “humorist,” actually finished writing The Third Policeman somewhere around 1940.  It was turned down by publishers, and O’Brien claimed he lost the manuscript. [Truth is, it sat on a table in his house for 20 years without him noticing it.]  It was finally published a year after his death.

I’ve only ever read O’Brien’s first novel, At-Swim-Two-Birds.  The only thing I can remember about it is that it was completely confusing when it was supposed to be funny.

Keep that in mind as you’re reading this month: The Third Policeman is supposed to be FUNNY.

From “The Third Policeman” – Review by Randy Schaub

“In The Third Policeman, our hero and narrator, a nameless young man with a wooden leg, assists in a money-motivated killing, and, after trying to retrieve the stashed goods some time later, passes into a strange otherness — a place that superficially resembles the Irish countryside, but which casually disobeys the normal laws of How Things Work. He encounters a small building of impermanent and shifting geometry which turns out to be the local barracks — it is here that he meets the policemen. The novel has that special quality — the fantastic made believable, yet retaining its power to amaze — that is the hallmark of authors like Borges, Kafka, or Barthelme. The events are alternately frightening, baffling, and hilarious, and are brought into three dimensions by perfect, musical prose.”

“The main of the book is devoted to the solution of our young hero’s mystery, and to the further mystery of the bizarre policemen which populate the world he has wandered into. The policemen speak in an infectious, over-wrought dialogue that you’ll have to take care not to pick up yourself. They invent devices that turn noise into electricity. They take gauge readings in a subterranean, industrial version of eternity. I don’t want to delve too far into this storyline, rather I urge you to discover it for yourself. You’ll never ride a bicycle again.”

Continue reading »

WRLB/Bookclub Selection August 2010: Slaughterhouse-Five (1969) by Kurt Vonnegut
This entry is part 2 of 5 in the series Slaughterhouse 5

“All of the true things that I am about to tell you are shameless lies.” — Kurt Vonnegut, Cat’s Cradle. [ALL PICTURES: CLICK FOR LARGER VIEW] First off, you should know Kurt Vonnegut NEVER gave that MIT commencement speech [“Ladies and Gentlemen of the class of 1997:  Wear Sunscreen”] that floated all over the Internet. [...]

This entry is part 1 of 5 in the series Slaughterhouse 5

Happy August WRLBers! This month’s book is Slaughterhouse Five by Kurt Vonnegut. It’s another relatively short one! The reading schedule will be easy this time. We have a little over 200 pages (by my copy) spread through 10 chapters. That gives us roughly 2 and a half chapters a week. I don’t know why I’m [...]

WRLB Lord of the Flies Podcast is up!

The WRLB Lord of the Flies Bookclub Podcast Discussion is now up! On the call is @bam0mbot @lostiegirl78 and @jedimasterchief Download here! (http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-76142/TS-381697.mp3) Forgive the audio, for whatever reason, Amber’s audio sort of came in waves. And and here’s what I meant when I said I was disappointed in my younger self. I am absolutely [...]

WRLB Lord of the Flies Podcast TOMORROW NIGHT (UPDATED)

You are cordially invited to the LOST Bookclub discussion of this month’s book Lord of the Flies by William Golding. Our discussion leader will be @lostiegirl78! She’ll be passing around the conch shell during the discussion as we talk about the book and how it relates to our favorite show LOST. I’ve slaved over a [...]

WRLB - Lord of the Flies - Relevant Lost Episodes

HAPPY A-LITTLE-PAST-THE-MIDWAY-WELLLLLL-WE-MIGHT-AS-WELL-SAY-3/4-POINT Lord of the Flies is a much shorter book, so you should be around chapter 8ish, but with only 12 chapters you’ve still got time to catch up! Our book didn’t wash up on shore in any of the episodes, but a couple of times it was referenced in conversation. Thanks to Lostpedia [...]

WRLB/Bookclub Selection July 2010: Lord of the Flies (1954) by William Golding
This entry is part 1 of 1 in the series Lord of The Flies

BOOK PREVIEW by Amy (@aohora) Logline: A plane evacuating a group of schoolboys from WWII torn Britain is shot down over a deserted tropical island. The surviving boys’ attempts to organize themselves for rescue drive them straight into the question of human existence: Who are we once accountability for external law and order are removed? [...]

© 2010 LOSTblog Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha